Fred W. Alvarez - Coblentz Law

Details

P 415.772.5740

F 415.989.1663

falvarez@coblentzlaw.com

Education

J.D.

Stanford Law School (1975)
B.A., with honors,

Stanford University (1972)

Practices

Employment

Litigation

Fred Alvarez, one of the preeminent employment lawyers in the United States, combines a distinct blend of employment law experience, public service, and legal profession leadership. He has had an active individual and class action litigation practice devoted to defending employers in trial and on appeal in claims brought by private and governmental parties and by former senior executives. He has led the employment practice of two major American law firms. Fred has represented employer clients in a range of industries, including energy, retail, communications, financial services, and technology.

He currently focuses substantial attention on providing strategic and compliance advice, advising Boards and Special Committees of Directors as independent outside counsel, conducting sensitive internal investigations and serving in jointly- or court-appointed monitorships, as either Monitor, Independent Consultant, or Special Master of national employment class action decrees. He has testified before Congress on several occasions.

Appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, Fred served in two federal government sub-cabinet positions. As Assistant Secretary of Labor, he managed the Wage and Hour Division and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. He also served as a Commissioner of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. He began his career as a trial attorney with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and was a law clerk to Chief Justice LaFel E. Oman of the New Mexico Supreme Court.

Fred is chair of the Employment practice group.

Fred is a co-founder of the American Employment Law Council and is a member of Law360’s Employment Editorial Advisory Board. He was an adviser to the ALI Restatement of Employment Law and has been appointed to serve on judicial-selection committees. He is a former chair of the ABA Commission on Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the Profession, has served on the ABA Commission on Women in the Profession, and is a former president of the Bar Association of San Francisco. Fred serves on the board of directors of Equal Rights Advocates and the Latino Community Foundation. He is also a member and former chair of the board of governors of Public Advocates Inc.

Fred earned his J.D. from Stanford Law School in 1975 and his B.A. in economics, with honors, from Stanford University in 1972. He recently completed a five-year term on the board of trustees of Stanford University.

National Monitorships

Serving as monitor on the consent decree commitments of a major technology company to redesign and enhance its complaint, investigative, performance appraisal and severance polices in response to a shareholder derivative action.
Serving as a monitor in two separate decrees calling for national restaurant chains to devise systems and processes to promote more age diversity in the selection processes for front-of-house restaurant operations.
Serving as special master in a decree governing the compensation and promotion practices as they relate to women employees of a national retailer.
Serving as independent consultant in a conciliation agreement calling for a national technology company to devise and operate an internal complaint process that could more effectively address complaints of sexual harassment.
Serving as independent consultant in a decree calling for a national insurance company to devise new promotion, compensation and retention systems for various diverse populations in its workforce.
Served as monitor of a decree calling for a national apparel retailer to devise new systems and process to diversify its retail sales force with respect to gender, race and national origin.
Served as monitor of a decree calling for a national financial services company to devise new recruiting, hiring, compensation, and promotion systems so that those systems would more effectively promote the advancement of women and minorities.
Served as an independent consultant in a decree calling for a national pharmaceutical retailer to devise and operate an internal complaint process that could more effectively address complaints of discrimination.
Served as an independent consultant to, and monitor of a national consent decree of, a major construction company on its commitments to improve and address its investigative and remedial efforts responding to alleged racial harassment at construction sites.

Notable Representations

Represented a national bank in successfully obtaining enforcement of an arbitration agreement against a former executive vice president following appeal of a trial court order denying a motion to compel arbitration on the grounds the arbitration agreement was unconscionable. The court of appeal reversed the trial court decision and directed the court to enter a new order enforcing the arbitration agreement, after holding that the executive had consented to be bound to a valid arbitration agreement and rejecting all the trial court’s findings that the agreement was both procedurally and substantively unconscionable.
Represented a major international bank in connection with alleged age and national origin discrimination by a former executive vice president of a California subsidiary bank. The former executive vice president alleged that his termination was motivated by his age as the oldest member of the executive staff and by his national origin, which he shared with the former CEO who was also terminated at the same time. The case was successfully removed from a California state court and the federal court was convinced to compel arbitration of the matter. After four days of testimony, the arbitrator agreed with the international bank that its motivation for the termination was exclusively due to legitimate performance concerns that had developed surrounding the executive vice president. The arbitrator entered a judgment for the bank and dismissed the case in its entirety.
Represented a global media and technology company in a successful decertification of a California-wide putative wage and hour class action affirmed by the California Court of Appeal of the First Appellate District. The Court affirmed a ruling by the Superior Court of Contra Costa decertifying a California class of communication technicians in a case alleging meal and rest period, off the clock, and wage and record-keeping violations. The Court held that company policy was in full compliance with California law and that there was no common evidence of variations from those policies. It further held that the record developed in the trial court fully supported the trial court decision to decertify a class that had been certified on a theory that the putative class could not ultimately prove.
Represented a national hotel chain in obtaining a dismissal of a class action lawsuit alleging wage-hour violations relating to missed meal and rest periods, unpaid overtime, inaccurate wage statements, late payment of final wages, and failure to reimburse business expenses violations under the California Labor Code.
Represented a Silicon Valley semiconductor company in a multi-plaintiff wage and hour lawsuit by former engineers alleging misclassification and other wage and hour claims. The Superior Court of Santa Clara County dismissed this case with prejudice following the granting of summary judgment on the merits of the claim.
Represented a mother and her four children who had escaped Guatemala in 2015, fleeing gang violence and domestic violence, and requested asylum at the U.S. border. A defensive asylum application was submitted on behalf of the mother and children in January 2016 and trial went before the Immigration Judge in March 2017. The Immigration Judge granted the mother and children asylum on April 28, 2017, and the government waived all rights to appeal.

Listed in Chambers USA 2024 among the “Senior Statespeople” in the California — Labor & Employment category
The Best Lawyers in America® (2007-2025), including as the San Francisco “Lawyer of the Year” in Labor Law – Management (2025, 2022, 2020) and in Litigation – Labor & Employment (2021), and as the Northern California “Lawyer of the Year” in Labor Law — Management (2018, 2016, 2015)
Fellow, College of Labor and Employment Lawyers
One of the “Most Powerful Employment Attorneys,” Lawdragon/Human Resource Executive (2012-2016), “Hall of Fame Inductee” (2017), and “Leading U.S. Corporate Employment Lawyer,” Lawdragon 500 (2020-2025)
Honored with the Defense Lawyer Award for Excellence in Ethics in Complex Litigation, UC Hastings Center for Litigation and the Courts (2022)
Lecturer in Law, Stanford Law School, Labor Law (Spring 2016 and Winter 2018)

Fred regularly appears as a speaker and is a contributor to various legal publications on labor and employment issues.

Recent publications include:

“California Assembly Bill Five Excepts Certain Categories Of Workers From Independent Contractor Classification Overhaul“
“Another Warning Shot on Employee Nonsolicit Agreements,” San Francisco Daily Journal (February 2019)
“Baltazar: Did Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements Turn a Corner?,” Bender’s California Labor & Employment Bulletin, Vol. 2018, No. 5 (May 2018)

Recent speaking engagements include:

“Diversity in the Profession: How Far We Have Come & Where Are We Going From Here,” 2024 NorCal Diversity Leadership Summit, California Employment Lawyers Association and Foundation for Advocacy Inclusion and Resources, San Francisco, CA (June 2024)
“Is Your Workplace Investigation Truly Independent? The Ethics and Practicalities of Attorneys Acting in an Independent Role,” Annual Labor and Employment Law Section Meeting, Bar Association of San Francisco, Yosemite, CA (February 2024)
“Affirmative Action in Employment After the Harvard Case,” American Employment Law Council Annual Meeting, Amelia Island, FL (October 2023)
“Did the Supreme Court Just Cancel Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging?,” HR.com Webcast (September 2023)
“The Impact of the Pending Affirmative Action Cases on DEI Efforts,” American Employment Law Council Annual Meeting, Tucson, AZ (October 2022)
“DEI at the Top: Closing the Leadership Gap for Women and Diverse Attorneys,” World Services Group 2022 Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA (September 2022)
“Meeting the Challenge of Racial Equity and Justice in the Workplace,” Annual Meeting, Labor and Employment Relations Association (June 2021)
“Unpacking the High Profile Sexual Harassment Case: What The Players are Actually Up to Before The Lawsuit Hits,” Annual Labor and Employment Law Section Meeting, Bar Association of San Francisco, Yosemite, CA (February 2020)
“Equal Pay: Trends in Litigation, Emerging Legislation & Corporate Equity Initiatives,” ABA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA (August 2019)
“Contrary, Controversial and Concerted Activity,” Annual Labor and Employment Law Section Meeting, Bar Association of San Francisco, Yosemite, CA (February 2018)
“Discovery Protocols in Employment Discrimination Litigation,” Northern District of California Judicial Conference, Napa, CA (May 2017)
“Tackling Unprofessional Conduct Towards Women,” Northern District of California Chapter of The Federal Bar Association, San Francisco, CA (March 2017)
“Top Priorities for the New Administration and the New Congress: Navigating a Changing Landscape,” San Francisco, CA (February 2017)
“Class Action Settlements: Strategies in Class and Collective Action,” ABA Annual Labor & Employment Conference, Chicago, IL (November 2016)
“Recent Labor and Employment Cases in the U.S. Supreme Court,” Bar Association of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (September 2016)
EEOC Advanced Systemic Institute – Class Action Remedies, Washington, D.C. (June 2016)
California Employment Law Council Summer Educational Program – Pay Equity and the New EEO-1, San Francisco, CA (June 2016)

News

News - August 15, 2024

Fred Alvarez and Jeff Bernstein Awarded Lawyers of the Year, 32 Coblentz Attorneys Recognized by The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America 2025

Learn More

News - July 17, 2024

California Supreme Court Clarifies that the Issue of Severing Allegedly Unconscionable Clauses from Employment Arbitration Agreement is a Qualitative Rather Than Quantitative One and the Arbitration Agreement Should Be Enforced if Possible Rather Than Abandoned

Learn More

News - June 6, 2024

Nine Coblentz Partners and Four Practices Ranked in Chambers USA 2024

Learn More

See All News